Quick verdict
The short answer
This isn’t really a fight between three rivals — it’s a choice between three different problems. Mem is an AI note-taking app that organizes your knowledge so you can find anything later. Reclaim AI is an AI calendar assistant that defends your time by auto-scheduling habits, focus blocks, and 1:1s. Fellow is an AI meeting-notes app that records calls, writes summaries, and turns meetings into structured follow-ups. Most productivity-minded people will eventually want two of the three: Mem or Fellow for capturing information, and Reclaim for protecting the time to act on it. Below is the honest breakdown of what each one costs, what it’s best at, and where it disappoints — so you can buy the one that matches the problem that’s actually hurting you.
This is a research-based comparison. We have not tested Mem, Reclaim AI, or Fellow hands-on; every fact below comes from the vendors’ published pricing/docs and independent reporting. Prices checked September 30, 2026.
Mem: the AI note-taking app that organizes itself
Mem is built on a simple bet: folders, tags, and manual organization are the reason your notes go to die. Everything goes into one stream, and the AI sorts it — connecting related notes, surfacing relevant context while you write, and answering questions over your whole archive in plain language. It’s the closest thing to a personal “second brain” that requires zero maintenance.
| Plan | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 25 new notes/month, 25 AI chat messages/month, basic search |
| Mem Pro | ~$12/month | Unlimited notes, chat, deep search, collections, templates, PDF ingestion, connected email, API access, beta features like meeting briefs |
| Mem Teams | Custom (around $12.50/seat/month billed annually) | Everything in Pro plus group billing, shared workspaces, priority support, dedicated success manager |
Note on pricing: Mem’s Pro price has moved more than once in 2026 — reported anywhere from $12 to about $15/month — so confirm the current number on Mem’s pricing page before subscribing.
Strengths: Deep Search is the standout — describe what you’re looking for in plain language (“that conversation about Q3 budget concerns”) and Mem finds it even without keyword matches. Heads Up surfaces related notes in a side panel as you write, so old context finds you instead of the reverse. Agentic Chat can create, edit, and reorganize notes on your behalf with version history. Voice Mode transcribes recordings into clean notes, and the Chrome extension plus email forwarding (forward anything to save@mem.ai) make capture nearly frictionless.
Weaknesses: The free tier’s 25 notes/month is a trial, not a plan — daily users outgrow it immediately. Everything depends on the cloud; without internet, the AI search and organization go quiet, and offline support is weak. The price instability is annoying for budgeting. And the single-stream, no-hierarchy design that fans love can frustrate people who think in folders and outlines — there’s no structure to fall back on.
Reclaim AI: the AI calendar assistant that protects your time
Reclaim doesn’t take notes or record meetings — it sits on top of Google Calendar and Outlook and defends your schedule. You define what matters (two hours of focus time daily, lunch, breaks, habits), and Reclaim auto-schedules those blocks, makes them look busy to colleagues, and intelligently reshuffles them when real meetings land. In 2026 it added AI Agents and Predictive Planning, which uses historical data to estimate how long tasks actually take.
| Plan | Annual billing | Monthly billing | Key limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lite | $0 | $0 | 1 user, 1 habit, 1 scheduling link, 1 calendar sync, 1-week scheduling range |
| Starter | $10/seat/month | $12/seat/month | Up to 10 seats, unlimited habits, 3 scheduling links, full task integrations, 8-week range |
| Business | $15/seat/month | $18/seat/month | Up to 100 seats, unlimited scheduling links, team analytics, delegated access for EAs |
| Enterprise | $22/seat/month | — | 100+ seats, SSO/SCIM, org-chart-aware scheduling, enterprise reports |
Strengths: Nobody does AI time-blocking better. Habits auto-schedule in proactive or reactive mode, Smart 1:1s find mutual availability without email ping-pong, and buffer/travel time gets inserted automatically. Task-to-calendar sync pulls work from Asana, Todoist, ClickUp, Linear, Jira, and Google Tasks straight onto your schedule. Time analytics show exactly where your hours went — genuinely useful for no-meeting-day policies. The free Lite tier is usable for evaluation, every account gets a 14-day Business trial with no credit card, and discounts run 50% for education and 20% for nonprofits, startups, and switchers from competitors.
Weaknesses: Reclaim is a calendar layer, not a system — you still need a separate task manager subscription ($5—$14/user/month more) for it to be useful. The AI occasionally reschedules blocks you’d rather keep put, which erodes trust. It doesn’t touch email, won’t summarize your day, and can’t extract tasks from your inbox. US-only hosting with no EU data residency is a real procurement blocker for European teams. And per-seat pricing compounds: a 15-person team on Business is $225/month before the task manager it’s designed to sit on top of.
Fellow: the AI meeting-notes app for structured team workflows
Fellow (Fellow.app until its August 2025 rebrand to Fellow.ai) pairs AI recording with the meeting process: collaborative agendas, auto-generated notes, action items with owners and due dates, and follow-ups that sync into your project tools. It records via a meeting bot or botless desktop capture across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Slack huddles, transcribing in 100+ languages. Think of it as the meeting assistant for teams that want repeatable meeting hygiene, not just a transcript library.
| Plan | Annual billing | Monthly billing | AI notes & recordings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 5/user, lifetime (not monthly); up to 5 seats |
| Solo | $19/month | $29/month | Unlimited, for individuals |
| Team | $7/user/month | $11/user/month | 10/user/month; up to 20 seats |
| Business | $15/user/month | $23/user/month | Unlimited; 50 uploads/user/month; CRM integrations |
| Enterprise | $25/user/month (10-user min) | Contact sales | Unlimited; HIPAA/BAA, SSO, advanced permissions |
Strengths: The agenda-to-action-item pipeline is the differentiator — meetings start from a shared agenda, and Fellow extracts decisions and assigns follow-ups that sync to Salesforce, HubSpot, Asana, Jira, and 50+ other integrations. “Ask Fellow” lets anyone query the full meeting history in plain language. Security is baseline, not premium: SOC 2 Type II on every plan, and Fellow states it never trains models on customer meeting content. At $7/user/month annual, the Team tier undercuts most competitors, and there are no overage fees.
Weaknesses: The free plan’s allowances are lifetime, not monthly — five AI notes ever per user, then you’re done, which makes it a trial masquerading as a plan. The Team tier’s 10 notes/user/month will feel tight for meeting-heavy teams. Botless capture requires the desktop app running, so browser-only or mobile sessions still need the bot. Meeting data is hosted on AWS in North America only, which complicates EU procurement, and SSO plus HIPAA coverage require the top Enterprise tier with its 10-user minimum.
Head-to-head
| Mem | Reclaim AI | Fellow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem it solves | Finding and connecting your notes | Protecting time on your calendar | Running better meetings |
| Starting price (annual) | $0 (25 notes/mo); Pro ~$12/mo | $0 (Lite); Starter $10/seat/mo | $0 (5 lifetime notes); Team $7/user/mo |
| Free plan verdict | Usable trial; outgrown fast | Usable for solo evaluation | Lifetime caps make it a demo |
| Key strengths | Semantic deep search; auto-organization; agentic chat edits notes | Auto-scheduled habits & focus time; Smart 1:1s; time analytics | Agenda-to-action-item workflow; Ask Fellow; 100+ languages |
| Key weaknesses | Cloud-dependent; price moves; no folder structure | Needs a separate task manager; US-only hosting; reschedules surprise | Lifetime free caps; Team note limits; NA-only hosting |
| Best for | Writers, researchers, consultants building a knowledge base | Managers and makers drowning in meetings | Teams that want structured, accountable meetings |
Which should you pick
Pick Mem if your problem is “I write things down and never find them again.” If you’re a writer, researcher, consultant, or founder sitting on years of scattered notes, Mem’s semantic search and automatic connections deliver the most magic per dollar. Just budget for Pro (~$12/month) — the free tier won’t survive real use.
Pick Reclaim AI if your problem is “my calendar fills up and my real work never happens.” If you’re a manager, developer, or anyone whose deep work gets eaten by meetings, Reclaim’s defended focus blocks are the highest-ROI automation of the three. Start on Lite or the 14-day Business trial; go Starter ($10/seat/month annual) once the habit sticks. Remember to factor in the task-manager subscription it needs underneath.
Pick Fellow if your problem is “our meetings produce no follow-through.” If your team runs recurring 1:1s, standups, and client calls and the action items keep evaporating, Fellow’s agenda-to-action-item pipeline plus Ask Fellow is purpose-built for that. The Team plan at $7/user/month annual is the value entry point; heavy meeting teams should price Business for unlimited notes.
Can you use more than one? Yes — and that’s the honest answer for many readers. Mem and Reclaim solve completely non-overlapping problems (knowledge vs. time), and Fellow overlaps with neither’s core job. A plausible stack: Reclaim defending your calendar, Mem holding your knowledge, and Fellow running your team meetings. The combined solo cost (Mem Pro ~$12 + Reclaim Starter $10 + Fellow Solo $19, annual) is around $41/month — not trivial, but cheaper than the hours each one claims to save.
FAQ
Do Mem, Reclaim AI, and Fellow compete with each other?
Not directly. Mem is a note-taking/knowledge app, Reclaim AI is a calendar/scheduling assistant, and Fellow is a meeting-notes app. They solve different productivity problems, which is why many people end up using two of them together rather than choosing one winner.
Which is cheapest?
Fellow’s Team plan is cheapest per seat at $7/user/month billed annually (though capped at 10 AI notes/user/month). Reclaim AI’s Starter is $10/seat/month annual, and Mem Pro is around $12/month for a single user. All three have free tiers, but Fellow’s is the most restrictive (lifetime caps) while Reclaim’s Lite is the most genuinely usable.
Which is best for teams?
Fellow, by design — its Business and Enterprise tiers are built around shared meeting workflows, templates, CRM sync, and admin controls. Reclaim AI’s Business tier is strong for teams that want shared scheduling intelligence and time analytics. Mem is primarily a personal knowledge tool; its Teams tier exists but collaboration is not its center of gravity.
Do any of them train AI on my data?
Fellow states it never trains models on customer meeting content and holds SOC 2 Type II on every plan. Mem and Reclaim publish standard privacy policies and SOC 2 compliance (Reclaim holds SOC 2 Type II), but teams with strict data-governance needs should review each vendor’s DPA — particularly around hosting regions, since both Reclaim and Fellow host in the US only.

