OnSiteIQ Review 2026: Weekly 360 Capture and AI Progress Tracking for Owners

Updated October 13, 2026 – Tested Intelligence

Quick verdict: OnSiteIQ is progress tracking without the capture burden: its own specialists walk your sites weekly with 360-degree cameras, the imagery is mapped automatically to your floor plans, and its computer vision reports progress across trades. It fits owners, developers and investors watching several projects at once far better than a GC running one job day to day. Pricing is not public, so budget only after a quoted proposal.

What it is

OnSiteIQ, founded in 2017 and based in New York, sells construction intelligence to real estate owners, developers and investors – not field software for the crew building the work. The model is service plus platform: its capture specialists across the US and Canada visit active sites weekly and record high-resolution 360-degree walkthroughs, aiming to document the whole job.

That imagery is mapped to the project’s floor plans, so stakeholders can virtually tour a floor from a browser. On top of the record, its computer vision engine – which the company says draws on a database of 4 billion images – tracks progress against the baseline schedule. It says it can monitor up to 24 trades across 8 asset classes, and needs only floor plans and a baseline schedule to start.

For Construction Pros reported its North American launch as a visual documentation service using machine intelligence to map walkthroughs to plans for remote progress, quality and safety audits.

Key features

• Done-for-you weekly capture by OnSiteIQ specialists across the US and Canada
• 360-degree walkthroughs automatically mapped to floor plans for remote virtual tours
• AI progress tracking across up to 24 trades and 8 asset classes, against the baseline schedule
• Early delay indicators and completion forecasting, with portfolio analytics
• Time-stamped visual record for verifying payment applications and resolving disputes
• Portfolio view for owners and investors monitoring multiple projects

Pricing

Pricing is not public. OnSiteIQ does not publish per-project or per-user rates on its site, and we found no current public price list. Expect a quoted proposal based on project count, size and capture frequency, and ask in writing what is included – capture visits, progress tracking and seats – before comparing it against self-capture tools where your own staff does the walking.

Who it’s for

Real estate owners, developers, investors and lenders with projects spread across cities, who need objective ground truth without flying staff to every site weekly – especially where progress percentages feed payment decisions.

Who should skip it

General contractors who want a tool their own field team runs daily should look at self-capture platforms instead – the weekly, specialist-led cadence is built for oversight, not daily field management. Single-project owners who can walk the job themselves will struggle to justify it over a 360 camera and a simpler app.

Pros

• Capture is handled for you weekly, so coverage does not depend on site-team discipline
• Imagery is mapped to floor plans, making remote checks fast and location-specific
• Progress reported by trade against schedule, not just shown as pictures
• Portfolio-level view suits owners and investors with dispersed projects
• Objective, time-stamped record helps with payment verification and disputes

Cons

• Pricing is not public – no way to budget or compare without a sales process
• Weekly capture is a snapshot cadence, not live or daily monitoring
• Aimed at owners and developers; less useful as a GC’s day-to-day field tool
• Needs floor plans and a baseline schedule up front, and depends on site access for capture
• Performance figures on its site are company claims, not independently verified

FAQ

What does OnSiteIQ do?

Its specialists record weekly 360-degree walkthroughs, the platform maps the imagery to floor plans, and its AI tracks progress by trade against the schedule.

How much does OnSiteIQ cost?

Pricing is not public. The vendor quotes proposals individually, so confirm scope – capture frequency, projects, trades tracked and users – in the quote before signing.

Does OnSiteIQ replace site visits?

No. It reduces routine oversight visits, but inspections, quality sign-off and safety responsibility still sit with the project team.

Bottom line

OnSiteIQ is the buy-the-outcome option: you supply floor plans and a schedule, its specialists supply the weekly record, and the AI turns it into trade-level progress and delay signals. For owners overseeing a portfolio, that is compelling – just get the quoted price and capture scope in writing, because nothing about cost is public.